Gautam Adani

The Cabinet of Ministers chaired by President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has revoked a decision made by his predecessor Ranil Wickremesinghe in June last year to award a controversial 484 MW of wind power plants in Mannar and Pooneryn to Adani Green Energy SL Ltd.

The project was challenged on multiple grounds, including the arbitrary and excessive price of US cents 8.26 per kilowatt hour at a time when local bidders were offering prices as low as 4.88 cents.

Many environmental organisations, including the Wildlife and Nature Protection Society and Environmental Foundation Ltd., opposed the project owing to deficiencies in the Environmental Impact Assessment and because Mannar is a critical habitat for migratory birds. The local community, represented by the Bishop of Mannar too, vehemently opposed the project because of the harm to local industries and livelihoods.

In the course of his election campaign, the present President pledged to cancel the deal and call for international tenders to develop wind power in Sri Lanka.

Consistent with that pledge, on 30 December the Cabinet decided “To revoke the cabinet decision dated 2024-05-06 numbered CP No. 24/0850/621/047 submitted by the then Minister of Power and Energy on ‘Proposal of Adani Green Energy SL Limited for the Development of 484 MW of Wind Power Plants in Mannar and Pooneryn.”

Biodiversity scientist Rohan Pethiyagoda, who for the last year fought tirelessly against the proposal award told the Daily FT: “Everyone interested in environmental integrity and financial transparency will celebrate the fact that President Dissanayake has delivered on his promise to defeat this conspiracy to defraud the people of Sri Lanka.”

“Personally, I am delighted by this decision. But it is not enough. The Government must now release all the related files to the Bribery Commission and request a full investigation as to how this scam was perpetrated in the first place. Who was the mastermind behind it? Remember, the last Government agreed to buy electricity from Adani at a rate that was 70% higher than the locally tendered price. Into whose pockets was that 70% going? It added up to billions of dollars,” he said.

Commenting on the culture shift brought about by the NPP Government, Pethiyagoda said: “The degree of transparency we are now seeing is unprecedented. There was no song and dance from the NPP about this hugely consequential Cabinet decision. Instead, the attorney general routinely filed it in court as part of a 174-page submission that reads like something out of Wikileaks. This is a huge victory for environmental and social justice. Much kudos to AKD.”

Pethiyagoda also told the Daily FT that by the same decision, the Cabinet has appointed a new Project Committee and Procurement Committee to make recommendations regarding Adani’s proposal, but that that committee would be constrained by the President’s election pledge to invite international bids for the project. “It could be that the President is under pressure to give this project to an Indian company,” he said, “in which case it is likely that bids will be restricted to companies incorporated in India. Then, Adani too can compete in an open and transparent manner.”